Is the Traditional Plan Biblical?

Everyone who drinks this water will be thirsty again, but whoever drinks the water I give them will never thirst. Indeed, the water I give them will become in them a spring of water welling up to eternal life” (John 4:13-14).

By now the UMC’s Special General Conference decision to strengthen our church law regarding homosexuality is old news. Our official position still states that homosexuality is “incompatible with Christian teaching.” Proponents of “The Traditional Plan” insist that the real issue is not homosexuality, but biblical interpretation.

As a pastor, I am reluctant to take a public stance on divisive issues. I worry that it will create controversy. People might distance themselves from a pastor whom they consider to be on the wrong side of the debate. A pastor’s opinion can inflict pain on parishioners.

My views regarding homosexuality involve so much more than collecting data and deciding if I am ‘for” or “against” it. I have inward struggles, personal anxieties and unresolved questions. I am not trying to please anyone here. In fact, I realize this blog post may not please anyone at all.


The ‘Outcast’ Samaritan, Alonso Cano

We prefer a straight yes or no when it comes to controversial issues. We feel more comfortable with absolutes than with uncertainty. So, rather than have you wait until the end of this article, I”ll share my conclusion first:

I did not want the Tradition Plan to pass. It has inflicted pain on countless United Methodists. To me it is  inconsistent and unfair. The issue of homosexuality is not as black and white as proponents make it seem. If I disapprove of homosexuality based on Scripture, I need to be consistent and take all Scripture just as seriously. I am not afraid to reread Scripture and rethink any of my beliefs, including my beliefs about homosexuality.

Now here’s the struggle behind the viewpoint:

Am I ignoring God’s Word? I came to faith in a Baptist church, which taught that the Bible is the Word of God. Believing something contrary to Holy Scripture is to ignore God. Though my beliefs have changed since I was a Baptist, this is still my conviction.

There are 6 passages in the Bible (Leviticus 18:22, Leviticus 20:13, Romans 1:26-27, 1 Corinthians 6:9-10 and 1 Timothy 1:9-10) that say same sex relationships are sins. The Leviticus passages describe same sex relationships as an abomination. Romans 1:18-32 says homosexuality is not what God intended. 1 Corinthians 6:9-10 says that those who practice homosexuality will not inherit the kingdom of God. 1 Timothy 1:9-10 says it contradicts “sound doctrine” and the gospel.

The Bible is precious to me. Through Scripture I encounter a healing, risen savior. The Bible is God’s Word to me, so how can I ignore these passages?

Am I taking the whole Bible seriously, or just parts of it? There are many passages that I have not taken seriously.  I eat shrimp (Lev. 11:10) and wear mixed fabric (Lev. 11:19). In fact, there are many Levitical laws I do not observe. I don’t want homosexuals and adulterers to be executed, even though the Bible commands it (Lev. 20:10, 20:13). 1 Corinthians commands women to wear head coverings and to remain silent (11:2-16). I  don’t ask my female parishioners to do this. Women cannot wear jewelry, lead or teach men (1 Tim.2:8-12), and yet the UMC ordains women and I encourage women to lead ministry teams at HUMC.

These are just a few examples. The Bible is God’s Word, so I need to understand and accept all of it – including the parts that confuse me and trouble me.

Do Biblical interpretations ever result in pain?

Women’s rights have been suppressed and children have suffered. Polygamy was assumed in the Old Testament, and Paul teaches that women must quietly submit to their husbands (1 Cor. 11:3, 14:34-36).

The Bible did not outlaw slavery, but regulated it (Ex. 21:2-6, 20-21; Leviticus 25:44-46).  It’s true that the Mosaic Law regulated slavery in such a way that it was immensely more humane than the practice of surrounding nations, but I consider all forms of slavery to be a horrible sin.

I was divorced 18 years ago, and my church leaders forbid me from remarrying and entering ordained ministry, despite my deep desire to do both. Jesus said divorce and remarriage were unacceptable. (Mark 10:2-12). Paul said that pastors must be the husband of one wife (1 Timothy 3:2, 12; Titus 1:6).

Deuteronomy 22:28-29 requires a woman to live with her rapist. I can’t imagine the suffering when this law was implemented. Why not execute the rapist?

People have suffered because of a wrong understanding of Scripture. The Church has acknowledged this many times in history.

Who are my homosexual neighbors? Something that sounds fine in principle may not be so simple in practice.  Beliefs might seem right in my head, but they are challenged when I meet real people in the real world. As a pastor I’ve developed relationships with gay persons and couples. Their experiences are very different from mine. Their world views can be very different than mine. But we share a world and a church, and I want to understand them as deeply as possible. In certain ways, my homosexual neighbor is not so different:

They have God-given spiritual gifts. So do I. They want to compassionately serve the church and the world. So do I. They have been hurt by a local church and/or denomination. So have I. They struggle with sin. Like me.

Where have my struggles taken me?

The words of Jesus in Matthew 7:16 are stuck in my head: “You will know them by their fruits.” If my use of Scripture ever causes more pain than fruit, such as demonstrated by the recent General Conference decision, then I need to reread (not rewrite) the Scriptures.  All of them. Including the 6 passages about homosexuality. I want to reread them alongside those about Jesus’ immeasurable love for all who have ever been pushed to the margins (e.g. Mark 1:30-45; John 4:4-42; Romans 8:37-39).

I must listen to different perspectives. I can’t be satisfied with any conclusion that is based on the premise “I’ve always believed that….”

I must be sensitive to all human suffering. This is hard when my theological beliefs (or that of my denomination) are the cause of it.

In the end, I must love and accept those who arrive at different conclusions.

In the aftermath of GC2019, United Methodist bishops, lay and clergy leaders have flooded the airways with messages of unity in the midst of diversity. Let’s not hear these as we would the overhear announcements at the airport. Let messages like this be in our hearts and minds during these tumultuous times:

“For he himself is our peace, who has made the two groups one and has destroyed the barrier, the dividing wall of hostility, by setting aside in his flesh the law with its commands and regulations. His purpose was to create in himself one new humanity out of the two, thus making peace, and in one body to reconcile both of them to God through the cross, by which he put to death their hostility” (Ephesians 2:14–16, NIV).

About Corey Sharpe

Where do we get our beliefs? Three theological perspectives have significantly shaped my Christian identity: Evangelicalism, the early Methodist tradition and liberation theology. From my coming to faith in a Baptist church and throughout my education in a Baptist school and college, I was nurtured by convictions that emphasized a spiritual rebirth, a personal relationship with Jesus Christ and the centrality of the Bible. Even when I disagree with certain aspects of evangelicalism, it has deeply influenced my sense of what it means to be a follower of Jesus Christ. My seminary studies spawned my interest in early Methodism, particularly its approach to spiritual formation. Its leaders were convinced that only a foundation of doctrine and discipline would lead to a meaningful transformation of the heart and mind. In other words, having the mind of Christ enables me to be more like Christ. Life in a suburban culture obscures the increasing gap between the poor and rich, as well as the Bible’s close identification with the poor. My doctoral work in socio-cultural context exposed me to liberation theology, which helps me see redemptive history as a history of oppressed groups, written from the perspective of the powerless, about a God who is actively involved with the poor in their struggles. I am now the pastor at Huntingtown United Methodist Church in Calvert County, Maryland. Together my wife and I are raising 4 young theologians.
This entry was posted in christianity, Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Is the Traditional Plan Biblical?

  1. Tuesday Tynan says:

    Wow! This really hit the spot for me. Particularly the part about our theological beliefs being the cause of peoples pain…I am going to pass this around as much as I can.


    From: The Other Six Days
    Reply-To: The Other Six Days
    Date: Sunday, March 17, 2019 at 8:18 PM
    To: Rich Barney
    Subject: [New post] Is the Traditional Plan Biblical?

    Corey Sharpe posted: “Everyone who drinks this water will be thirsty again, but whoever drinks the water I give them will never thirst. Indeed, the water I give them will become in them a spring of water welling up to eternal life” (John 4:13-14). By now the UMC’s Special Gene”

  2. Carol Childers says:

    When a church is torn by the issue of sexual norms, our feet will do the walking. We can flee to a church that upholds the norms and teachings that God established. Too many churches now have chosen to ignore the Creator and instead turn to the creature for guidance in all things.
    Simple enough. We may go to a liberal church if we don’t agree with the Traditional Plan, or stay in
    that church that is foundering, or seek out a Bible-based church, according to our understanding of God’s plan for us as a people called to turn away from that which God has called an abomination. Interesting to me that the Traditional Plan is even challenged. We’re sinking further and further into the muck.
    I cannot imagine Jesus advocating homosexual behavior. Isn’t that a stretch? He died on the cross to save us from every sin. Spread the Word that we need to hear. Do it in love, but do it.

  3. Pingback: Is the Traditional Plan Biblical? - HUNTINGTOWN UNITED METHODIST CHURCH

  4. Marcia says:

    It is a terrible thing to be the object of and the crux (reference to a cross not unintended) of theological, biblical interpretation, but there one can find oneself. If you had been denied ordination it truly would have been a travesty of justice. Thank you for thoughtful blog. Keep guiding us all in threading this needle. Blessings.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s